Resources for Reflective Writing



The Difference between Reflective and Descriptive Writing


Both descriptive and reflective writing are important in documenting your action research for yourself and others. Memory is reconstructive. It uses bits of evidence to reconstruct scenes and events. Rich description can preserve one's time-sensitive way of seeing a set of actions and reactions. Without careful note-taking throughout the process of action research, it is very difficult to remember the conditions as the memories tends to reconstruct with the benefit of evolving knowledge. In any process of change, it is important to keep a research log—notes that describe what is seen and heard and your thoughts about it. A good researcher is always aware that their point-of-view is not the only one that defines reality. The more evidence of the perceptions of others that are collected, the deeper the researcher's understanding will be of the multiple perspectives on the same actions. Descriptive writing aims to be low inference.

For example, writing "the students were excited and did an excellent job on their projects" is drawing an inference from an observation. A lower inference description of the same event by an action researcher might read, "The students spent most of the period focused on their projects with relatively few distractions. They did not want to leave at the end of the period. The teacher assessed each of the projects as meeting all of the objectives set for the activity."

imgres.jpg

Reflective writing can and often does contain descriptions of events—but the goal of the writing is very different. The focus is not on what happened, but why you think it happened the way it did, and on how what happened connects to the past events and ideas and possible futures that such events might herald. The reflection mirrors the mind—providing in inside view of one's thinking about these connections. So while a reflection may begin by describing an action or a consequences of a action, it quickly leaves the details of what happened and uses some aspect of the situation as a springboard for exploring the researchers analysis and synthesis of actions or consequences, and why and how they are connected. For example, the researcher might have noticed something about the way people work, some problem might serve as a metaphor for something that occurs frequently, or an event might trigger relationships to situations that were similar or different in the work of others or in the researcher's own past experiences. Another possibility is that the connections might trigger some change in the way the researcher comes to see the events, some shift in perspective, or the development of a new individual or group skill might alter the way people interact with one another. The reflection might dwell on those relationships. Something learned about the people involved in the action research might lead the researcher to question the way they think about an issue. For reflective writing, the mirror shows what cannot be seen with the eyes—the thinking that the researcher is doing about the action and consequences of the actions for now and for the future.

The Reflection Spirals


1) Reflection Spiral 1: Deepening your understanding of the context--
images-3.jpg
  • Start at center...place the action and reaction in the center of a circle...
  • Ask Why did things happen the way they did?
  • What were the critical factors?
  • Keep asking why until you have exhausted every angle


Reflection Spiral 2) Examining Action and Identity --
  • What did this process do to me?
  • How has it changed who I am or how I act? This is looking back and projecting forward and thinking about your identity.
  • Are you the same person now?
  • If not how have you changed?
  • What has changed about your actions?
  • If you act in different ways does this cause you to see yourself in a different way?
  • Do others see you in a different way?
  • What is the relationship between action and identity?


Reflection Spiral 3: Shifting Conceptual Frames --
  • Now as you spiral out one more time, ask yourself how has this action and reactions changed the way I think?
  • What is the conceptual changes that comes from reading ideas, and then working with them?
  • What ideas have changed and what is consequence of this shift in way I organize my thinking.
  • Have my values shifted or become more complex?
  • Have there been any changes to my educational philosophy?


Reflection Questions and Frameworks


As you work on writing your reflection here are some different reflection questions or frameworks that different writers have suggested:
Inside-My-Head-By-Andrew-Mason-265x300.jpg
Coghlan and Brannick (2005) list the following advice on reflection from different writers :

Kolb's (1994) suggest a four-part sequence experiential learning cycle
He suggested a four part sequence:
1) Concrete experience: Taking a single event bounded by time provide a clinically neutral explanation of what happened, what was said, and the consequences of the actions were.
2) Reflection: This is a personal reflection on how the actions affected the person. It is an examination of how the person viewed their actions including feelings, reactions, observations and judgements.
3) Conceptualizations: This is looking at what happened with the lenes of prior research or theoretical work. It is also explicitedly linking the outcomes to the theory of action that was held at the beginning.
4) Experimentation: The final part of this reflective process looks to what new ideas the researchers has for applying ,testing, or extending what was learned in the process of reflection. It is the setting of specific and concrete behavioral goals for action in similar situations.

Another strategy for reflection similar to this one comes from Schein (1999) who suggests an observation, reaction, judgement, and intervention model ( (cited in Coghlan and Brannick 2005)
1) Observation: Describe what happened.
2) Reaction: Explore emotional reactions to what has been observed working out how the events affected the players in the situation.
3) Judgement: Analyze, process and make judgements based on the observations and feelings with a goal of figuring out what is based on feeling and what is based on analysis of what happened.
4) Intervention: Plan what the next approach will be to make something happen

Coghlan, D., Brannick, T. (2005), Doing Action Research in Your Own Organization, 2nd ed., Sage, London.




E. Alana James offers the following advice on reflection, or how not to fool yourself....
8693117115_4f8aa21e4a_z.jpg

Any person using action research to improve their personal, professional or family life, will go through regular cycles of reflection. In other articles I have stressed the need for this to be done as a protocol and as regular practice, done in the same way each week so that outcomes can be compared over time. It is hoped that reflection aids us in keeping our objectivity. The danger is that it might actually cause the opposite and that you can end up chasing your tail, or in other words reflecting on your reflections. This article becomes a reflection on the ups and downs of reflective practice, and is spurred on by a number of thoughts experienced and discuss at the Collaborative Action Research Network conference, 2010, in Cambridge

The consideration that Dr. Stern pointed out was that reflection can put a candy coating of success over a cycle of activities, or as Richard Feynman, Nobel Prize winner, was cited as saying, "Science is a way of trying not to fool yourself.... and you are the easiest person to fool." Stern suggested that we ask the question, "What am I turning a blind eye to? How am I fooling myself?"


(this link to the article gives helpful advice on how not to fool yourself...)
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/5392178
and for other articles some of which focus on action research
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=E._Alana_James









RETURN TO T9 Activities or to Tutorial 9


Continue forward to Tutorial 10




back to tutorial index-1708301.jpg